Automation index
How much of a Addiction doctor’s job can AI already do?
An AUDIT form comes earlier. Walking the abstinence when Friday slips do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Addiction doctor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#359 / 643
View rankingAddiction doctor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
History, AUDIT and the urine screen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clinic, the relapse and the one who does not come.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Methadone, the dose and not rushing the taper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Detox, the bed and the syndrome.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Family, the stigma and not moralising.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Walk the abstinence, and not turning away the one who slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- AUDIT
- methadone
- detox
- relapses
- urine screens
- addiction clinic
- withdrawal
- not moralise
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1223.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 643
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632