Automation index
How much of a Aerial technician’s job can AI already do?
A signal reading and a booking come earlier. Up on the roof until TDT actually shows does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Aerial technician
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#572 / 653
View rankingAerial technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Bookings, levels and install logs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Roof, mast, cable and outlet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Configure, tune and explain to the neighbour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
Community, porter and access.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Faults, building ICT and fibre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not falling and not leaving a building without the match.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Bookings, levels and install logs
- Roof, mast, cable and outlet
- Community, porter and access
- Faults, building ICT and fibre
- antenista
- instalador de antenas
- aerial technician
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 7422
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131