Automation index
How much of a Aerospace engineer’s job can AI already do?
A calculation and a model come earlier. Signing a part that actually flies does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Aerospace engineer
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#228 / 633
View rankingAerospace engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Calculate, simulate and certify structures and systems.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Drawings, tolerances and traceability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Bench, test flight and incidents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Vendors, quality and EASA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Documentation, versions and configuration.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Sign something that will not fall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Drawings, tolerances and traceability
- Bench, test flight and incidents
- Vendors, quality and EASA
- Documentation, versions and configuration
- Sign something that will not fall
- ingeniero aeronautico
- aerospace engineer
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2144
IS WORK OVER?
Aid worker
23%
#292 / 633
View rankingAid worker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Forms, logframe and the indicators.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
The field, local partners and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donor reports and the paperwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Security, evacuation and the call to stay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Community, conflict and not replacing the local.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Do no harm and owning the project.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- logframe
- field work
- justify projects
- local partners
- mission security
- aid indicators
- donor reports
- do no harm
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635