Automation index
How much of a Agile coach’s job can AI already do?
A board and a stock retro come earlier. The team stopping the fake sprint do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#288 / 723
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421
IS WORK OVER?
Fire investigator
22%
#412 / 723
View rankingFire investigator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Scene, the origin and not treading it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cause, the short and the rag.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sample, the lab and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the insurer and not selling it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The judge, the hearing and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Call the cause, and not selling it to the insurer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fire origin
- shorts
- rags
- samples
- expert reports
- insurers
- the scene
- not tread
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3119