IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Agile coach’s job can AI already do?

A board and a stock retro come earlier. The team stopping the fake sprint do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Agile coach

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
The real retro and the elephant in the room.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%32%+5.1
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%14%+2.2
Total100%24%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • retros
  • agile cadence
  • unblock teams
  • flow metrics
  • fake agile
  • agile training
  • dependencies
  • velocity

Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 264Pest control technician25%
  2. 265Property manager24%
  3. 266Community health worker24%
  4. 268Software architect24%
  5. 269Biochemist24%
  6. 270Parking attendant24%