Automation index

How much of a Aid worker’s job can AI already do?

A logframe comes earlier. Being there when it goes wrong, and doing no harm, do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

23%

AI can already do 23% of this job.

#292 / 633

Aid worker

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Forms, logframe and the indicators. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	44%	+7
The field, local partners and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Donor reports and the paperwork. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Security, evacuation and the call to stay. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Community, conflict and not replacing the local. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Do no harm and owning the project. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		23%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

26%

#213 / 633

NGO programme officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Design, indicators and the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	16%	+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low