Automation index
How much of a Aid worker’s job can AI already do?
A logframe comes earlier. Being there when it goes wrong, and doing no harm, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Aid worker
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#292 / 633
View rankingAid worker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Forms, logframe and the indicators.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
The field, local partners and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donor reports and the paperwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Security, evacuation and the call to stay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Community, conflict and not replacing the local.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Do no harm and owning the project.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- logframe
- field work
- justify projects
- local partners
- mission security
- aid indicators
- donor reports
- do no harm
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Station master
23%
#302 / 633
View rankingStation master
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Graph, orders and the station log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Platforms, the crossing and the late train.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Staff, shifts and the ticket-office gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Incident, passengers and the PA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Works, closures and leaving nobody on the platform.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they do not meet, and signing the graph.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- train graph
- orders
- platforms
- ticket office
- PA
- line crossings
- station shifts
- station logs
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 4323