Automation index
How much of a Air cargo agent’s job can AI already do?
An AWB comes earlier. Boarding on time without leaving the cargo on the ramp do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Air cargo agent
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#129 / 623
View rankingAir cargo agent
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
AWB, weight and the flight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Acceptance, screening and what cannot fly.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
ULD, build-up and the cut-off.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Customs, transits and the one that misses the flight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the urgent and not overbooking the hold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Board on time, and not leaving it on the ramp.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- AWB
- cargo screening
- ULD
- cut-off
- build-up
- air transits
- weight and volume
- the hold
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3331
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 623
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632