Automation index
How much of a Allergist’s job can AI already do?
An IgE panel comes earlier. Doing the challenge and not triggering anaphylaxis do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Allergist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#291 / 643
View rankingAllergist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read IgE, prick tests and the reaction history.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Skin tests, challenges and immunotherapy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Avoidance, adrenaline and allergic asthma.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Clinic for children, mites and the one who cannot eat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Letters for school, canteen and the plane.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Anaphylaxis, on-call and owning the vaccine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- allergy tests
- prick test
- allergy vaccines
- read IgE
- treat anaphylaxis
- allergy clinic
- supervised challenge
- adrenaline
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131