Automation index
How much of a Allergist’s job can AI already do?
An IgE panel comes earlier. Doing the challenge and not triggering anaphylaxis do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Allergist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#286 / 633
View rankingAllergist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read IgE, prick tests and the reaction history.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Skin tests, challenges and immunotherapy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Avoidance, adrenaline and allergic asthma.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Clinic for children, mites and the one who cannot eat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Letters for school, canteen and the plane.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Anaphylaxis, on-call and owning the vaccine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- allergy tests
- prick test
- allergy vaccines
- read IgE
- treat anaphylaxis
- allergy clinic
- supervised challenge
- adrenaline
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 633
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142