Automation index
How much of a Allergist’s job can AI already do?
An IgE panel comes earlier. Doing the challenge and not triggering anaphylaxis do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Allergist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#320 / 733
View rankingAllergist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read IgE, prick tests and the reaction history.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Skin tests, challenges and immunotherapy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Avoidance, adrenaline and allergic asthma.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Clinic for children, mites and the one who cannot eat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Letters for school, canteen and the plane.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Anaphylaxis, on-call and owning the vaccine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- allergy tests
- prick test
- allergy vaccines
- read IgE
- treat anaphylaxis
- allergy clinic
- supervised challenge
- adrenaline
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141