Automation index
How much of a Ambulance driver’s job can AI already do?
A call and a route come earlier. Arriving in one piece and not making the patient worse do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Ambulance driver
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#581 / 653
View rankingAmbulance driver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Calls, routes and service logs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Drive urgent, park and help the technician.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Stretcher, transfer and family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Cleaning, kit and handovers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Hospital, ICU and times.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not arriving late to a heart attack.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive
- route
- load goods
- Calls, routes and service logs
- Drive urgent, park and help the technician
- Stretcher, transfer and family
- Cleaning, kit and handovers
- Hospital, ICU and times
- Not arriving late to a heart attack
- conductor de ambulancia
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 8322
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131