Automation index
How much of a Anthropologist’s job can AI already do?
A transcript and a code come earlier. Being in the field and not projecting too much do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Anthropologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#292 / 643
View rankingAnthropologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Transcribe, code and write.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Field, interviews and observation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Archive, literature and research design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Ethics, consent and communities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Teaching, projects and outreach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not extracting from people without giving anything back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Transcribe, code and write
- Field, interviews and observation
- Archive, literature and research design
- Ethics, consent and communities
- Teaching, projects and outreach
- antropologo
- anthropologist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3091.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211