Automation index
How much of a Appliance technician’s job can AI already do?
An error code comes earlier. Diagnosing in someone else’s kitchen and leaving it washing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Appliance technician
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#465 / 743
View rankingAppliance technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Code, history and the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Strip, test and the built-in one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Order the part, second visit and the client who is out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Warranty, misuse and what it does not cover.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The tight kitchen and not marking the unit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Leave it washing, and not swapping the board blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- diagnose appliances
- error codes
- strip built-ins
- spares
- warranty
- second visit
- test boards
- service call
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 7412
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141