Automation index
How much of a Aquaculturist’s job can AI already do?
An oxygen reading and a ration come earlier. The batch not dying in the night do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Aquaculturist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#317 / 623
View rankingAquaculturist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Oxygen, ration and the mortality log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cage, net and the escape.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Water quality, exchange and the bloom.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Vaccines, the vet and the batch that turns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The storm, the swell and not losing the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not dying in the night, and not pushing density.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cage oxygen
- fish ration
- nets
- water quality
- aquaculture mortality
- batch vaccines
- swell
- stocking density
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 6221
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142