Automation index
How much of a Art conservator’s job can AI already do?
A photo and an analysis come earlier. The scalpel, and not loading the work, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Art conservator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#450 / 653
View rankingArt conservator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Survey, photos, analysis and the treatment proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cleaning, fill, inpainting and protection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Reversibility, and not overworking the piece.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, dossier and the owner’s or museum’s yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Transport, climate and the piece’s setting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Ethics and liability for what is touched.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- conserve art
- clean paint
- inpainting
- fills
- treatment report
- reversibility
- analyse the work
- not overworking the piece
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211