Automation index
How much of a Art conservator’s job can AI already do?
A photo and an analysis come earlier. The scalpel, and not loading the work, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Art conservator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#524 / 743
View rankingArt conservator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Survey, photos, analysis and the treatment proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cleaning, fill, inpainting and protection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Reversibility, and not overworking the piece.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, dossier and the owner’s or museum’s yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Transport, climate and the piece’s setting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Ethics and liability for what is touched.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- conserve art
- clean paint
- inpainting
- fills
- treatment report
- reversibility
- analyse the work
- not overworking the piece
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141