Automation index
How much of a Art conservator’s job can AI already do?
A photo and an analysis come earlier. The scalpel, and not loading the work, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Art conservator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#436 / 633
View rankingArt conservator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Survey, photos, analysis and the treatment proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cleaning, fill, inpainting and protection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Reversibility, and not overworking the piece.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, dossier and the owner’s or museum’s yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Transport, climate and the piece’s setting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Ethics and liability for what is touched.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- conserve art
- clean paint
- inpainting
- fills
- treatment report
- reversibility
- analyse the work
- not overworking the piece
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Storyboard artist
27%
#179 / 633
View rankingStoryboard artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, shots and the rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Draw, arrows and the one that does not read.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Review, the director and the scene change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Delivery, numbering and the missing one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The budget, the impossible and not drawing a shoot that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be shot, and that it reads.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- shots
- camera arrows
- rhythm
- shooting script
- numbering
- review with direction
- scenes
- board delivery
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-1014.00· ESCO/ISCO 2166