Automation index
How much of a Art teacher’s job can AI already do?
A worksheet comes earlier. Them getting their hands dirty without copying the model do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Art teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#443 / 743
View rankingArt teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Project, the sheet and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, the one who will not dare and the one who bins it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Technique, the mistake and not doing it for them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Show, the corridor and not hanging only the pretty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, 'it's a soft subject', and not dropping the bar.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they get dirty, and not copying the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- art sheets
- art projects
- technique
- school shows
- classroom kit
- not do it for them
- the bar
- getting dirty
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149