Automation index
How much of a Art teacher’s job can AI already do?
A worksheet comes earlier. Them getting their hands dirty without copying the model do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Art teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#436 / 733
View rankingArt teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Project, the sheet and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, the one who will not dare and the one who bins it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Technique, the mistake and not doing it for them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Show, the corridor and not hanging only the pretty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, 'it's a soft subject', and not dropping the bar.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they get dirty, and not copying the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- art sheets
- art projects
- technique
- school shows
- classroom kit
- not do it for them
- the bar
- getting dirty
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330
IS WORK OVER?
Railway engineer
22%
#389 / 733
View rankingRailway engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Track, geometry and the study.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Points, the blade and the one that will not close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
OLE, the height and the gauge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Works, the possession and not leaving the wire wrong.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The operator, the rush and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it does not derail, and not signing half-done points.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- track geometry
- points
- OLE
- gauge
- possessions
- blades
- railway studies
- not jump to a yes
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142