Automation index
How much of a Audiologist’s job can AI already do?
An audiogram and a curve tweak come earlier. Fitting an aid so the person actually hears does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Audiologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#288 / 633
View rankingAudiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Trial, mould and adapt the aid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Explain, habituation and follow-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports for ENT and notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Repair, clean and prototype stock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Children, older people and not overselling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit
- Trial, mould and adapt the aid
- Explain, habituation and follow-up
- Reports for ENT and notes
- Repair, clean and prototype stock
- Children, older people and not overselling
- audiologo
- audiologist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1181.00· ESCO/ISCO 2266
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 633
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421