Automation index
How much of a Audiologist’s job can AI already do?
An audiogram and a curve tweak come earlier. Fitting an aid so the person actually hears does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Audiologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#293 / 643
View rankingAudiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Trial, mould and adapt the aid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Explain, habituation and follow-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports for ENT and notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Repair, clean and prototype stock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Children, older people and not overselling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit
- Trial, mould and adapt the aid
- Explain, habituation and follow-up
- Reports for ENT and notes
- Repair, clean and prototype stock
- Children, older people and not overselling
- audiologo
- audiologist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1181.00· ESCO/ISCO 2266
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131