Automation index
How much of a Audiologist’s job can AI already do?
An audiogram and a curve tweak come earlier. Fitting an aid so the person actually hears does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Audiologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#288 / 633
View rankingAudiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Trial, mould and adapt the aid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Explain, habituation and follow-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports for ENT and notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Repair, clean and prototype stock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Children, older people and not overselling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Audiograms, thresholds and a first fit
- Trial, mould and adapt the aid
- Explain, habituation and follow-up
- Reports for ENT and notes
- Repair, clean and prototype stock
- Children, older people and not overselling
- audiologo
- audiologist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1181.00· ESCO/ISCO 2266
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131