Automation index

How much of a Avionics technician’s job can AI already do?

A BITE comes earlier. Calibrating the kit and signing that it flies do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#391 / 643

Avionics technician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
BITE, manual and the fault tree. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Bench, the pin and the oxidised connector. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	12%	+2.2
Calibrate, software and the config. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Line, the aircraft on stand and the slot. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The pilot report and not swapping the box blind. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Sign that it flies, and not leaving BITE red. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

26%

#218 / 643

NGO programme officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Design, indicators and the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	16%	+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low