Automation index
How much of a Bank teller’s job can AI already do?
A count and a deposit come earlier. Spotting a bad note and serving the pension queue do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Bank teller
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#85 / 623
View rankingBank teller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Deposits, withdrawals, transfers and cashing up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Serve the window, identify the customer and manage queues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Sell simple products and update records.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spot irregularities, notes and doubtful operations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Balance the till, audits and hand over to treasury.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Rules, cash and liability for the window.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- count cash
- serve the teller window
- take deposits
- balance the till
- identify customers
- spot fake notes
- sell bank products
- cash audit
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3071.00· ESCO/ISCO 4211
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 623
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641