Automation index
How much of a Banker’s job can AI already do?
A score and a dossier come earlier. Looking the client in the eye, saying no, and owning the risk do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Banker
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#135 / 643
View rankingBanker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Client file, scoring and desk KYC.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Product proposals, simulation and reporting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Meetings, negotiation and close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Risk calls, exceptions and escalation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Compliance, audit and the file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Book, referrals and long relationship.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Client file, scoring and desk KYC
- Meetings, negotiation and close
- Risk calls, exceptions and escalation
- Compliance, audit and the file
- Book, referrals and long relationship
- banquero
- banker
- gestor de banca
- private banker
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131