Automation index
How much of a Banker’s job can AI already do?
A score and a dossier come earlier. Looking the client in the eye, saying no, and owning the risk do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Banker
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#135 / 643
View rankingBanker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Client file, scoring and desk KYC.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Product proposals, simulation and reporting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Meetings, negotiation and close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Risk calls, exceptions and escalation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Compliance, audit and the file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Book, referrals and long relationship.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Client file, scoring and desk KYC
- Meetings, negotiation and close
- Risk calls, exceptions and escalation
- Compliance, audit and the file
- Book, referrals and long relationship
- banquero
- banker
- gestor de banca
- private banker
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2052.00· ESCO/ISCO 2412
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262