Automation index
How much of a Battery technician’s job can AI already do?
A BMS comes earlier. Diagnosing the module without setting the bank on fire do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Battery technician
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#537 / 633
View rankingBattery technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
BMS, SOH and the log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Module, the imbalance and the one that swells.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Shop, isolation and not shorting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Thermal, the fire and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The vehicle, the warranty and not swapping blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No fire, and the module right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- BMS
- SOH
- modules
- imbalance
- swelling
- isolation
- thermal fire
- battery warranty
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3023.00· ESCO/ISCO 3113
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142