Automation index
How much of a Beekeeper’s job can AI already do?
A hive log comes earlier. Checking without angering them and taking honey do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Beekeeper
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#421 / 653
View rankingBeekeeper
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Check, queen and the hive log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Honey, supers and the smoker.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Varroa, treatments and not losing the stand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Moving hives, bloom and the move.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The neighbour, the sting and the field permit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Take honey, and not leaving them without stores.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- check hives
- supers
- varroa
- moving hives
- smoker
- queen
- bloom
- the stand
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-2092.00· ESCO/ISCO 6123
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131