Automation index
How much of a Beekeeper’s job can AI already do?
A hive log comes earlier. Checking without angering them and taking honey do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Beekeeper
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#421 / 653
View rankingBeekeeper
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Check, queen and the hive log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Honey, supers and the smoker.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Varroa, treatments and not losing the stand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Moving hives, bloom and the move.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The neighbour, the sting and the field permit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Take honey, and not leaving them without stores.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- check hives
- supers
- varroa
- moving hives
- smoker
- queen
- bloom
- the stand
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-2092.00· ESCO/ISCO 6123
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211