Automation index
How much of a Bellhop’s job can AI already do?
A luggage tag comes earlier. Getting them up whole without losing the one at the back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Bellhop
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#497 / 653
View rankingBellhop
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tag, bags and the floor map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Up, the lift and the one that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Room, the VIP and not going in unannounced.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Tip, the shift and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The group, the coach and not leaving one in the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Whole, and not losing the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- bags
- floors
- the lift
- VIP
- tips
- lobby
- groups
- luggage tags
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9621
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131