Automation index
How much of a Bellhop’s job can AI already do?
A luggage tag comes earlier. Getting them up whole without losing the one at the back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Bellhop
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#491 / 643
View rankingBellhop
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tag, bags and the floor map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Up, the lift and the one that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Room, the VIP and not going in unannounced.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Tip, the shift and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The group, the coach and not leaving one in the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Whole, and not losing the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- bags
- floors
- the lift
- VIP
- tips
- lobby
- groups
- luggage tags
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9621
IS WORK OVER?
NGO programme officer
26%
#218 / 643
View rankingNGO programme officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design, indicators and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Justify, invoices and the donor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Partners, meetings and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it works, and not inflating the indicator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design projects
- justify to donors
- indicators
- activity report
- coordinate partners
- timetable
- project invoices
- neighbourhood work
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635