Automation index
How much of a Bellhop’s job can AI already do?
A luggage tag comes earlier. Getting them up whole without losing the one at the back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Bellhop
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#491 / 643
View rankingBellhop
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tag, bags and the floor map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Up, the lift and the one that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Room, the VIP and not going in unannounced.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Tip, the shift and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The group, the coach and not leaving one in the lobby.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Whole, and not losing the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- bags
- floors
- the lift
- VIP
- tips
- lobby
- groups
- luggage tags
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-4081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9621
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 643
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131