Automation index
How much of a Billing clerk’s job can AI already do?
An ERP comes earlier. Issuing the right invoice without blocking the client do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Billing clerk
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#152 / 643
View rankingBilling clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Orders, delivery notes and the invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
VAT, withholdings and the one that does not square.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Credit notes, the credit and the client who argues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Close, the immediate supply and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sales, the extra and not over-billing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The right invoice, and not blocking the client.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- delivery notes
- invoices
- VAT
- credit notes
- immediate supply
- billing close
- withholdings
- orders
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3021.00· ESCO/ISCO 4311
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211