Automation index
How much of a Billing clerk’s job can AI already do?
An ERP comes earlier. Issuing the right invoice without blocking the client do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Billing clerk
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#152 / 623
View rankingBilling clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Orders, delivery notes and the invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
VAT, withholdings and the one that does not square.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Credit notes, the credit and the client who argues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Close, the immediate supply and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sales, the extra and not over-billing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The right invoice, and not blocking the client.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- delivery notes
- invoices
- VAT
- credit notes
- immediate supply
- billing close
- withholdings
- orders
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3021.00· ESCO/ISCO 4311
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142