Automation index
How much of a BIM modeller’s job can AI already do?
A model and a clash come earlier. The site being able to build from that model do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
BIM modeller
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#109 / 643
View rankingBIM modeller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, families and clash detection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
IFC, BEP and trade coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Site, the one who will not open the model, and the meeting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quantities, parameters and the 4D nobody uses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The last-minute change and not breaking the federated model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be built, and not over-modelling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- BIM modelling
- clash detection
- Revit families
- IFC
- BEP
- coordinate trades
- BIM quantities
- federated model
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3118
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131