Automation index

How much of a BIM modeller’s job can AI already do?

A model and a clash come earlier. The site being able to build from that model do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

28%

AI can already do 28% of this job.

#109 / 623

BIM modeller

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Model, families and clash detection. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	52%	+9.4
IFC, BEP and trade coordination. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Site, the one who will not open the model, and the meeting. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Quantities, parameters and the 4D nobody uses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The last-minute change and not breaking the federated model. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
That it can be built, and not over-modelling. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 623

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low