Automation index
How much of a BIM modeller’s job can AI already do?
A model and a clash come earlier. The site being able to build from that model do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
BIM modeller
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#109 / 733
View rankingBIM modeller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, families and clash detection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
IFC, BEP and trade coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Site, the one who will not open the model, and the meeting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quantities, parameters and the 4D nobody uses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The last-minute change and not breaking the federated model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be built, and not over-modelling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- BIM modelling
- clash detection
- Revit families
- IFC
- BEP
- coordinate trades
- BIM quantities
- federated model
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3118
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141