Automation index
How much of a Blood bank technician’s job can AI already do?
An automated crossmatch comes earlier. Confirming the group and not issuing the wrong bag do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Blood bank technician
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#120 / 703
View rankingBlood bank technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Group, screen and the bag crossmatch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Fractionate, label and traceability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The emergency, the massive and the ID error.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donation, apheresis and the donor who feels unwell.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Stock, expiry and what theatre asks for.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The right bag and owning the blood group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crossmatch blood
- blood group
- fractionate products
- donor apheresis
- bag traceability
- massive transfusion
- label units
- blood bank
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3212
IS WORK OVER?
Instructional designer
27%
#158 / 703
View rankingInstructional designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Aim, the storyboard and the module.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- course storyboard
- modules
- learner pilot
- activities
- LMS
- completion
- feedback
- not a silly test
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351