Automation index
How much of a Blood bank technician’s job can AI already do?
An automated crossmatch comes earlier. Confirming the group and not issuing the wrong bag do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Blood bank technician
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#120 / 643
View rankingBlood bank technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Group, screen and the bag crossmatch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Fractionate, label and traceability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The emergency, the massive and the ID error.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donation, apheresis and the donor who feels unwell.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Stock, expiry and what theatre asks for.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The right bag and owning the blood group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crossmatch blood
- blood group
- fractionate products
- donor apheresis
- bag traceability
- massive transfusion
- label units
- blood bank
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3212
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262