Automation index
How much of a Book restorer’s job can AI already do?
A paper diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the copy do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Book restorer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#390 / 653
View rankingBook restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, paper and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, infill and the one that falls apart.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sew, bind and the spine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Box, climate and the store.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The owner, the copy and not leaving it new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not overworking the copy, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- paper
- infill losses
- sew sections
- spines
- conservation boxes
- store climate
- book diagnosis
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131