Automation index

How much of a Book restorer’s job can AI already do?

A paper diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the copy do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#377 / 633

Book restorer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Diagnosis, paper and the proposal. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Clean, infill and the one that falls apart. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Sew, bind and the spine. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Box, climate and the store. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The owner, the copy and not leaving it new. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Not overworking the copy, and signing the treatment. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

27%

#146 / 633

Comic artist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Paging, panels and the rhythm. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Pencil, ink and the one that will not close. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Colour, lettering and the balloon that will not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Delivery, the editor and the page change. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The serial, the fatigue and not recycling the same face. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
That it reads, and not eating the line. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low