Automation index
How much of a Book restorer’s job can AI already do?
A paper diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the copy do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Book restorer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#377 / 633
View rankingBook restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, paper and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, infill and the one that falls apart.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sew, bind and the spine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Box, climate and the store.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The owner, the copy and not leaving it new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not overworking the copy, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- paper
- infill losses
- sew sections
- spines
- conservation boxes
- store climate
- book diagnosis
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Growth manager
31%
#35 / 633
View rankingGrowth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Analytics, funnels and growth dashboards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 52% | +11.4 |
Copy, creatives and test variants.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Design experiments and read causality.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Align product, marketing and sales.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Ads budget and internal negotiation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
Decide what dies and what scales.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Analytics, funnels and growth dashboards
- Copy, creatives and test variants
- Design experiments and read causality
- Align product, marketing and sales
- Ads budget and internal negotiation
- Decide what dies and what scales
- growth manager
- growth hacker
- responsable de growth
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1161.00· ESCO/ISCO 2431