Automation index
How much of a Book restorer’s job can AI already do?
A paper diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the copy do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Book restorer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#377 / 633
View rankingBook restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, paper and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, infill and the one that falls apart.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sew, bind and the spine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Box, climate and the store.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The owner, the copy and not leaving it new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not overworking the copy, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- paper
- infill losses
- sew sections
- spines
- conservation boxes
- store climate
- book diagnosis
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Inventory clerk
28%
#105 / 633
View rankingInventory clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Count, locations and the adjustment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Floor, the gap and what is in the aisle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, shrink and the reason.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Audit, the auditor and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, the blind count and the stopped warehouse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match for real, and not adjusting blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cycle count
- adjust stock
- locations
- shrink
- blind count
- stock audit
- gaps
- variance reasons
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 4321