Automation index
How much of a Book restorer’s job can AI already do?
A paper diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the copy do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Book restorer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#377 / 633
View rankingBook restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, paper and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, infill and the one that falls apart.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sew, bind and the spine.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Box, climate and the store.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The owner, the copy and not leaving it new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not overworking the copy, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- paper
- infill losses
- sew sections
- spines
- conservation boxes
- store climate
- book diagnosis
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-4013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2621
IS WORK OVER?
Neurosurgeon
19%
#516 / 633
View rankingNeurosurgeon
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Indicate, consent and the plan with neurology.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Craniotomy, spine and the tumour that bleeds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 6% | +1.4 |
Neuronavigation, monitoring and the margin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Neuro ICU, pupils and raised pressure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Family, the deficit and rehab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 28% | +3.9 |
On-call, the haematoma and signing go or no-go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- craniotomy
- spine surgery
- neuronavigation
- brain tumour
- neuro ICU
- subdural haematoma
- intraoperative monitoring
- raised ICP
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1241.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212