Automation index
How much of a Botanist’s job can AI already do?
A digital herbarium comes earlier. Identifying in the field without killing the population do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Botanist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#343 / 693
View rankingBotanist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Herbarium, keys and the specimen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, the population and not collecting extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Survey, the habitat and the one that is lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the works and the one who will not hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The glasshouse, the culture and not mixing labels.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Identify, and not killing the population.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- herbarium
- keys
- populations
- botanical surveys
- habitats
- collect
- labels
- the field
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Adult literacy tutor
22%
#335 / 693
View rankingAdult literacy tutor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Level, the sheet and the one who did not come.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Reading, the contract and the small print.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Writing, the form and not doing it for them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Group, the shame and not exposing them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The council, the grant and not inflating attendance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they read the contract, and not being ashamed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- syllables
- reading contracts
- forms
- literacy groups
- shame
- small print
- attendance
- not expose
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2359