Automation index
How much of a Botanist’s job can AI already do?
A digital herbarium comes earlier. Identifying in the field without killing the population do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Botanist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#324 / 633
View rankingBotanist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Herbarium, keys and the specimen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, the population and not collecting extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Survey, the habitat and the one that is lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the works and the one who will not hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The glasshouse, the culture and not mixing labels.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Identify, and not killing the population.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- herbarium
- keys
- populations
- botanical surveys
- habitats
- collect
- labels
- the field
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Microbiologist
22%
#354 / 633
View rankingMicrobiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocols, plates and a first result.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Plate, incubate and read cultures.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 12% | +2.4 |
Report to the clinician and not jump.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, strains and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Biosafety, waste and kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not calling a negative that is a positive.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Protocols, plates and a first result
- Plate, incubate and read cultures
- Report to the clinician and not jump
- Quality, strains and documentation
- Biosafety, waste and kit
- Not calling a negative that is a positive
- microbiologo
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131