Automation index

How much of a Botanist’s job can AI already do?

A digital herbarium comes earlier. Identifying in the field without killing the population do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#329 / 643

Botanist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Herbarium, keys and the specimen. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, the population and not collecting extra. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Survey, the habitat and the one that is lost. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Report, the works and the one who will not hear. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The glasshouse, the culture and not mixing labels. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Identify, and not killing the population. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

21%

#440 / 643

Optician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
File, history and prescription. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	40%	+7.2
Lens orders, stock and appointments. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Eye exam, retinal image and fitting. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	20%	12%	+2.4
Frame fit and workshop. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	10%	+1.6
Advise without pushing and explain pathology. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Refer to ophthalmology and follow-up. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	16%	+2.2
Total	100%		21%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low