Automation index
How much of a Botanist’s job can AI already do?
A digital herbarium comes earlier. Identifying in the field without killing the population do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Botanist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#366 / 753
View rankingBotanist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Herbarium, keys and the specimen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, the population and not collecting extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Survey, the habitat and the one that is lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the works and the one who will not hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The glasshouse, the culture and not mixing labels.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Identify, and not killing the population.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- herbarium
- keys
- populations
- botanical surveys
- habitats
- collect
- labels
- the field
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Requirements engineer
27%
#181 / 753
View rankingRequirements engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Workshop, the actor and the requirement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Conflict, the loudest and not swallowing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Criterion, the test and not leaving it vague.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Change, the impact and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The project lead, the deadline and not cutting the one that matters.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is needed, and not the loudest one's.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- requirements
- actor workshops
- acceptance criteria
- change impact
- backlog
- tests
- not swallow the loudest
- ambiguity
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1299.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511