Automation index
How much of a Building surveyor’s job can AI already do?
A take-off and a log come earlier. Directing the build and signing the works do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Building surveyor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#321 / 633
View rankingBuilding surveyor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantities, valuations and cost control.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Working drawings and trade coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Site, visits and safety.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Client, contractor and site team.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, tests and the building book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Sign a build that will not fall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- building plans
- renders
- sign a project
- Quantities, valuations and cost control
- Working drawings and trade coordination
- Site, visits and safety
- Client, contractor and site team
- Quality, tests and the building book
- Sign a build that will not fall
- arquitecto tecnico
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3112
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 633
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632